Skip to main content

Costco Looks to Knock Out FACTA Receipt Class Action

What’s the News? Costco Wholesale Corporation recently moved to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging that the discount retailer printed more than the last five digits of a customer’s credit card number on her receipt, in violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). Costco argued in its motion that the document upon which the credit card number was printed – a longer document provided to the plaintiff by a customer service supervisor – was not actually a “point-of-sale” receipt within the meaning of FACTA, taking it outside the scope of the law.

Is It or Isn’t It? FTC Issues Guidance to Companies on Native Advertising

The Federal Trade Commission recently issued its long-anticipated guidance on native advertising. While the policy statement and its related guidance are new, the FTC emphasized that it has been regulating native advertising under Section 5 of the FTC Act since 1967 and that this policy document and guidance is a summary of the principles that it has developed over the years. While the FTC has been regulating native advertisements for decades, the issuance of this guidance indicates that the FTC will be making regulation of native advertising a priority in 2016.  

FTC Says Retailers Bamboozled Customers with Misleading “Bamboo” Products

What’s the News? The Federal Trade Commission has a reached a settlement agreement with several major retailers, including Nordstrom, Bed Bath & Beyond, and JCPenney, over claims that they improperly labeled and advertised rayon products as being made of bamboo. According to the FTC, rayon—a chemically manufactured fiber that is sometimes created from bamboo—is not the same as bamboo, making the companies’ “bamboo” claims improper. In addition to injunctive relief, the companies have agreed to pay over $1 million dollars under the settlement. 

Nordstrom and Jeans Company Pay $4M to Settle “Made in USA” Claim

On Monday, November 30, 2015, Nordstrom and denim manufacturer AG Adriano Goldschmied filed a motion to approve a settlement in California federal court, agreeing to pay more than $4 million to settle a consumer class action suit that accused them of falsely labeling jeans as “Made in USA.” The settlement was agreed upon in October 2015 after over a year of intense litigation.  

Is the Price Right? Nordstrom Facing Class Action Over “Compare At” Pricing

What’s the News? A federal judge for the Southern District of California recently held in Branca v. Nordstrom, Inc. that a class action could proceed with claims that Nordstrom made deceptive savings claims at a Nordstrom Rack store. In particular, the plaintiff alleged violations of California state law, claiming that Nordstrom listed higher “Compare At” prices next to sale prices, when the items had never been offered at that higher price by Nordstrom or other retailers.  

District Court Gives Go-Ahead to Marilyn Monroe’s Estate on False Endorsement Claim

What’s the News? A federal judge in the Southern District of New York recently held in A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC that the Lanham Act protects rights in a celebrity’s image long after his or her death. Specifically, the court determined that Marilyn Monroe’s estate could proceed with a Lanham Act false endorsement claim against a vintage collectibles licensor who was creating and marketing various products featuring images of the iconic celebrity.

10 Steps to Mitigate A Data Breach Before It Happens

Many of the clients that we advise are nervous about data protection, cyber issues, and the privacy of their customers and employees. Who can blame them? Every day we read news about another privacy breach. Some of the companies that we counsel are light years ahead – talking coding strategies and testing for vulnerabilities – while others are trying to determine how to be compliant and implement internal protocols in response to a breach.

California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Lacoste in Data Collection Class Action

Washington, DC — In a closely watched data collection case, Arent Fox LLP secured a victory for Lacoste when the California Supreme Court declined to clarify whether retailers in the state can ask customers for their personal information. On August 26, California’s high court responded to a certification request from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by agreeing with arguments put forward by Arent Fox.

California Governor Signs Bill Aimed at Aligning Nationwide “Made in USA” Labeling Requirements

On Tuesday September 1, 2015, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill that will enable products to be labeled and marketed with an unqualified “Made in USA” statement even if not entirely made in the United States – a major departure from California’s current more stringent standard.

FuelBand Advertising Claims Spark Settlement Agreement

Nike Inc. (Nike) recently agreed to pay more than $2.4 million to settle a class action lawsuit related to the Nike FuelBand activity tracker. The lawsuit, Levin v. Nike, was filed May 17, 2013, in California Superior Court in Los Angeles County. The Plaintiffs alleged violations of California unfair competition and false advertising laws, as well as breach of warranty.  The FuelBand Advertising Claims