Fashion Counsel with Anthony V. Lupo

Arent Fox's fashion law blog offers news, analysis, and insights for the industry from fashion attorney Anthony Lupo.

Fashion Counsel with Anthony V. Lupo
Advertising, Data Collection & Privacy
alert
FTC Says Retailers Bamboozled Customers with Misleading “Bamboo” Products

What’s the News?

The Federal Trade Commission has a reached a settlement agreement with several major retailers, including Nordstrom, Bed Bath & Beyond, and JCPenney, over claims that they improperly labeled and advertised rayon products as being made of bamboo. According to the FTC, rayon—a chemically manufactured fiber that is sometimes created from bamboo—is not the same as bamboo, making the companies’ “bamboo” claims improper. In addition to injunctive relief, the companies have agreed to pay over $1 million dollars under the settlement. 

Continue Reading →
Intellectual Property, Copyright
alert
“World of Warcraft” Creator Takes Battle to Court over Game’s Characters

What’s the News?

A federal judge in the Northern District of California recently dismissed a complaint in which video game producers claimed that characters from their games had been misappropriated by competing developers, in violation of copyright law. While characters are, in some cases, entitled to copyright protection, the court held that plaintiffs in such cases must state with considerable specificity which characters were allegedly infringed, and why those characters are copyrightable. General allegations of idea theft, the court explained, will not survive a motion to dismiss. 
 

Background

Continue Reading →
Labor & Employment
alert
New Year, New Rules: Seven Key Things to Know about Wage and Hour Laws for 2016

Employers should be aware of several important changes to federal and New York wage and hour laws, effective December 31, 2015 and January 1, 2016. Additionally, the New York Wage and Deduction Law has been extended to November 6, 2018. Changes to federal and state laws include:

Continue Reading →
Intellectual Property
alert
Imitation the Sincerest Form of Flattery? Court Dismisses Video Gamer’s Right of Publicity Claim

What’s the News? 

A judge in New Jersey federal district court recently dismissed a lawsuit brought against The Cartoon Network by a renowned video gamer. In particular, the plaintiff claimed in Mitchell v. The Cartoon Network, Civ. No. 15-5668 (D.N.J., November 20, 2015), that the network violated his right of publicity by depicting an animated version of him, without permission, in an episode of The Regular Show. The court, however, disagreed, holding that the network’s representation of the plaintiff was a parody entitled to First Amendment protection.

 

Background on the Case

Continue Reading →
Communications, Technology & Mobile
alert
After SCOTUS Declines CDA Defamation Appeal, Yelp Gives Court 5 Star Rating

The Lead

The Supreme Court gave Yelp and other interactive computer service providers reason to celebrate recently when it quietly declined to hear an appeal of a case charging Yelp with defamation in connection with one of the consumer reviews posted on the site. In refusing to hear the appeal, the Court left in place a Fourth Circuit decision that held that interactive computer service providers like Yelp cannot be held legally responsible for information created and developed by third parties.
 

The Facts

Continue Reading →
Fashion Law Videos, Intellectual Property
alert
Defending Design: How Fashion Brands Protect Products with Trade Dress

Fresh from the runway to the front pages of the internet, fashion designs are now instantly available for anyone to examine and copy. However, designers are not without legal protection. Fortune reports that major fashion brands like Tory Burch, Belstaff, Christian Louboutin, Hermès, and Alexander McQueen are successfully utilizing trade dress and design patent laws to defend and protect their creations from pirates.

In this episode of Fashion Counsel, partner Anthony Lupo reviews trade dress details with Intellectual Property partner Allan E. Anderson. The video covers defining trade dress from trademarks, how to establish trade dress and file for ultimate protection, and finally, how to defend against unwarranted action.

Continue Reading →
Consumer Product Safety, Class Action Defense, Advertising, Data Collection & Privacy
alert
Nordstrom and Jeans Company Pay $4M to Settle “Made in USA” Claim

On Monday, November 30, 2015, Nordstrom and denim manufacturer AG Adriano Goldschmied filed a motion to approve a settlement in California federal court, agreeing to pay more than $4 million to settle a consumer class action suit that accused them of falsely labeling jeans as “Made in USA.” The settlement was agreed upon in October 2015 after over a year of intense litigation.
 
Plaintiffs brought the case against both the manufacturer, AG, and the retailer that sold AG jeans, Nordstrom, and alleged various claims under the California consumer protection laws and business and professions code. The class action claimed that AG jeans’ fabric, thread, buttons, rivets, and certain subcomponents of the zipper assembly were manufactured outside of the United States.
 

Continue Reading →
Advertising, Data Collection & Privacy
alert
Is the Price Right? Nordstrom Facing Class Action Over “Compare At” Pricing

What’s the News?

A federal judge for the Southern District of California recently held in Branca v. Nordstrom, Inc. that a class action could proceed with claims that Nordstrom made deceptive savings claims at a Nordstrom Rack store. In particular, the plaintiff alleged violations of California state law, claiming that Nordstrom listed higher “Compare At” prices next to sale prices, when the items had never been offered at that higher price by Nordstrom or other retailers.
 

Background on the Case

 
Continue Reading →
Labor & Employment
alert
Retailers Under Fire: Urban Outfitters Becomes Latest Chain to Settle Wage Dispute

Urban Outfitters, Inc. – the parent company of Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People, and BHLDN – recently settled an overtime wage and hour class action brought by one of its employees who alleged that he and others similarly situated were forced to work overtime without appropriate pay and that the Company violated a number of other California labor laws. Berry v. Urban Outfitters Wholesale Inc., N.D. Cal., No. 4:13-cv-02628. 
 

Continue Reading →
Intellectual Property, Trademark, Advertising, Data Collection & Privacy
alert
District Court Gives Go-Ahead to Marilyn Monroe’s Estate on False Endorsement Claim

What’s the News?

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York recently held in A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC that the Lanham Act protects rights in a celebrity’s image long after his or her death. Specifically, the court determined that Marilyn Monroe’s estate could proceed with a Lanham Act false endorsement claim against a vintage collectibles licensor who was creating and marketing various products featuring images of the iconic celebrity. Notably, the court issued this holding over the licensor’s objection that the false endorsement claim was a “thinly veiled” attempt to enforce publicity rights, a separate type of claim not available under the Lanham Act.
 

The Legal Backdrop: Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC

Continue Reading →

Pages

SUBSCRIBE

Add the Arent Fox Fashion Law blog to your RSS feed reader.

Arent Fox In Your Inbox
To subscribe to Arent Fox Alerts and other news, click here.

ABOUT ARENT FOX LLP

Arent Fox LLP, founded in 1942, is internationally recognized in core practice areas where business and government intersect. With more than 350 lawyers, the firm provides strategic legal counsel and multidisciplinary solutions to clients that range from Fortune 500 corporations to trade associations. The firm has offices in Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, and Washington, DC.