In a wide-ranging interview with Forbes, Fashion leader Anthony Lupo touched on a number of topics, including the state of the fashion industry, the progression of client expectations, and where he’s focusing his own development.
What's really in a name? Hear "Lacoste" and an iconic crocodile amidst multi-colored polo shirts instantly springs to mind.
In this video episode of Fashion Counsel, Arent Fox Partner Anthony Lupo discusses Lacoste's style evolution with Deputy General Counsel Laurent Chedru. There has been a seismic shift in the fashion industry over the years, yet Lacoste has always managed to weather these changes with a steadfast commitment to staying true to its brand.
On February 15, 2018, the US House of Representatives passed legislation that would amend the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in an effort to stem “drive-by” lawsuits – so called because the lawyers who threaten them (and the plaintiffs they represent) often do not physically inspect the premises or intend to patronize the businesses they sue. Under the bill passed by the House (H.R.
By the of the end of 2017, the industry saw more than 300 companies file for bankruptcy, with no less than 30 involving major retailers. By end of the third quarter of 2017, more than 6,400 store closings occurred — triple the number of closings during the first half of 2016.
Fashion Law leader Anthony V. Lupo spoke with WWD as part of their feature on a recent trend by companies to bring provocative (and critical) social media voices into their fold.
“Why are brands so quick to show they’re “in” on the joke and in turn validate what is simply an Instagram account doing little beyond calling out designers for copying one another,” asked WWD.
In addition to overhauling the taxation of income of partnerships, corporations, and individuals, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law by President Trump on December 22, 2017 ushered in significant changes to the wealth transfer tax system. These changes will create major new opportunities to minimize the tax cost of transferring wealth, beginning in 2018.
Noting that on December 19, 2017, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit became the fourth federal appellate court to expressly reject the US Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) six-part test for determining whether interns and students are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the DOL announced on January 5, 2018 that it would adopt the “primary beneficiary” test endorsed by those courts in evaluating internships sponsored by private employers.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that the Lanham Act’s statutory ban on “immoral or scandalous” trademarks violates the First Amendment and is thus unconstitutional. See In re Brunetti, No. 2015-1109, 2017 WL 6391161, at *17 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2017). The decision comes just months after the US Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Federal Circuit’s decision in In Re Tam, holding that the ban on “disparaging marks” also unconstitutionally restricted free speech.
On November 21, 2017, an employee of L3 Technologies Inc., a government contractor, filed a putative class action in federal court in California alleging that the consent form the company provides to new hires and employees prior to conducting a background check runs afoul of the Fair Credit Reporting Act because it also includes a liability waiver.
On December 14, 2017, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) voted to overturn its 2004 decision in Lutheran Heritage Village-Livonia (Lutheran Heritage), which established a standard for evaluating the legality of employer handbook policies that has been used in recent years to invalidate a wide range of common workplace rules.